User talk:147.92.69.194

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sayeeda Warsi, Baroness Warsi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sayeeda Warsi, Baroness Warsi was changed by 147.92.69.194 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888333 on 2018-06-25T21:26:19+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wumpscut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Baerentp (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zersetzung have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Ambisonic hardware has been reverted. Your edit here to List of Ambisonic hardware was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/Ambisonic/faq_section18.html, http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/Ambisonic/faq_section18.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:07, 24 August 2018 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Pink Floyd, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Center for Victims of Torture. Shellwood (talk) 19:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:46, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Dorsetonian. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Snow golf, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Snow golf, you may be blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you for providing a ref when re-adding the content, however it contradicts your assertion that "Tina Blomme, the inventor and creator of snow golf"; it says "The game itself has been around in one incarnation or another for hundreds of years". Dorsetonian (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Snow golf. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Hello, you are mistaken and should unblock me. The article I referenced was not a press release but in fact an article in a community newspaper out of Toronto Ontario. I have taken the time to actually check into this. The author did not and has never worked with Tina Blomme at Snow Golf. He did an independent article on Snow Golf when Ms Blomme was living in Toronto-just before she designed and ran the Snow Golf course at the Ice Hotel in Quebec. Therefore, it was not a press release. Press releases originate from the subject matter (person or company). This is not the case. It is also Non Promotional as there is no call to action. Thus, please undo your edit removal and block. Be fair, Ms. Blomme deserves credit for a lifetime of work creating the sport. She is a legend.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Snow golf. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

For the future
Had you not made that last edit, I was drafting an explanatory comment here to try and help defuse things. Sigh....... Things don't always work out as well as they might. For the future, assertions that so-and-so invented something must be supported by several, wholly independent and reliable sources. A single piece in a Toronto newspaper that reads like a press release is wholly inadequate. You may be right in what you assert but Wikipedia accepts only that text which is reliably verifiable. For the record, threatening me in your last edit summary was also probably not a good idea and it could, on its own, have result in your editing priveliedges being blocked - but I guess that is now all water under the bridge.  Velella  Velella Talk 23:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, you are mistaken and should unblock me. The article I referenced was not a press release but in fact an article in a community newspaper out of Toronto Ontario. I have taken the time to actually check into this. The author did not and has never worked with Tina Blomme at Snow Golf. He did an independent article on Snow Golf when Ms Blomme was living in Toronto-just before she designed and ran the Snow Golf course at the Ice Hotel in Quebec. Therefore, it was not a press release. Press releases originate from the subject matter (person or company). This is not the case. It is also Non Promotional as there is no call to action. Thus, please undo your edit removal and block. Be fair, Ms. Blomme deserves credit for a lifetime of work creating the sport. She is a legend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.92.69.194 (talk • contribs)


 * In my comment above, I did acknowledge that you "might" be right in your assertions, but what is needed is reliable independent sources. A single source in a Toronto newspaper with uncertain provenance, isn't a reliable source. It also worries me greatly when people are described as a "legend" - that is often a sign of undue involvement and perhaps conflict of interest. Your edit summary "This is not a press release or an ad IT IS FACTUAL history. The history in the referenced article is the same history that is here. Hitting colored balls and playing a hockey with golf balls is not present day snow golf invented by Tina. THIS is NOT GERMANY and you are not NAZIs you are not allowed to rewrite history or BAN the truth with lies. DO NOT UNDO this or you will be charged" suggests a close involvement with Ms Blomme when you refer to her as "Tina". It also very much imitates previous edits by Snowgolf who was blocked for promotional editing at Snow golf. Used you to edit under this username in the past perhaps?  Velella  Velella Talk  23:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Flag of Alberta, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Proprietary software—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wi-Fi. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ANM🐁 T·C 22:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)