User talk:147.96.128.254

October 2023
Hello, I'm The Herald. An edit that you recently made to Mexicans seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * No, it wasnt a test or similar. It added new information to the page 147.96.128.254 (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you have an external relationship with the author of the source that you're plastering all over the place? M.Bitton (talk) 14:56, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I'm just adding information that you are removing I dont know why. If you want to delete info about something go another place, I will add relevant info 147.96.128.254 (talk) 14:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It's been removed because it looks like you're promoting the author. M.Bitton (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It can look like that but it is not. You can put an author or several authors in many publications in case u didnt know 147.96.128.254 (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If an author writes loads of articles he will be in many pages 147.96.128.254 (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Since you haven't addressed my concerns, i will ping (the other editor that reverted some of your edits). M.Bitton (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I dont owe you nothing. U are a simple editor so shut up and let others add info to Wikipedia. If you studied medicine (as you say) do important things 147.96.128.254 (talk) 15:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If these articles are reliable sources (I've not looked into the finer details), then it's possible that it would be appropriate to summmarise their contents, add that summary material to relevant Wikipedia articles and to cite them, but that's not what you're doing here. Simply noting that a source exists, like you did here isn't how we use sources on Wikipedia. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * the sources are by the same author: Antonio_Arnaiz-Villena. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I hadn't realised that we had an article about the author. Interesting. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Mexicans. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 15:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.