User talk:148.76.137.124

December 2021
Your recent editing history at Danger Force shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bo Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Walking with Beasts. --Mr Fink (talk) 20:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Sheep8144402. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Iwo Jima, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sheep (talk • he/him) 14:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sibree's dwarf lemur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 17:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, you may be blocked from editing. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Phuzion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Music and dances of the Federated States of Micronesia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Phuzion (talk) 17:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Wonder Pets! episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 07:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)