User talk:148.87.19.198

Welcome
Secondary sources are very reliable sources.. In fact the original source has no educational basis in the field of sociology where the definitions and science of the term 'dating' exist..

Please STOP deleting my content.. without any good cause..

Hello, 148.87.19.198, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- PBS (talk) 02:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Three content policies
We write articles based on three content policies: WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:NOR and some procedural policies based around WP:CONSENSUS.

Wikipedia is a tertiary source, its articles must be based on published reliable secondary sources. The best way to conceptualise it is as a newspaper and archive of published sources. If a subject has not been published in a reliable secondary source then we do not include it, not matter how worthy the subject. In addition if a reliable source does not describe an event using terminology that we think sums up the event we can not describe it that way, because this is a tertiary source and it dos not publish original ideas. If you want to contribute to this encyclopaedia, you must work within the self imposed bounds of the three content policies, or you will end up wasting a lot of time both for yourself and other editors.

The reason we have these self imposed limits is because a decade of collective experience, has taught the editors of this encyclopaedia, that binding ourselves with these rules stops the Wikipedia's articles becoming blog pages and not encyclopaedic articles.


 * As the character of Thomas More says in a Man for All Seasons "What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ... And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you - where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's, and if you cut them down -- and you're just the man to do it -- do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!"

--PBS (talk) 02:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Carbon black ‎ do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Carbon black ‎. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page The Rebel (book) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Your edit here to The Rebel (book) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://indisch.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/the-rebel-albert-camus/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street – Proposed for deletion
Notice: The article, Rumors and urban legends regarding Sesame Street, has been proposed for deletion by another user. Since you have contributed to the discussion page for the article, I'm notifying you about this matter. Northamerica1000 (talk) 12:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Books and publishing in Pakistan do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 01:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, 148.87.19.198, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Dating have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome! —Noah 19:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Dating
Hi,

First, I strongly recommend that you create an account so that when you do your editing your changes are not confused with other users who have this same IP address.

Second, it's very cool that your school work is providing you information to improve this encyclopedia. However, it's not a good idea to make contributions such as "Meaning #2 - as per paper in one of my sociology classes". Could you imagine reading that in a formal (book) encyclopedia? It would be a little odd. :-)

One approach you might take is to gather all the changes you would like to make to the article, present them on the article's talk page, and then see what other contributors have to say about those changes.

Best regards, —Noah 19:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Frozen (2013 film)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /talk 01:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Please do not clutter articles
The articles are List of films of XXXX year. I am not sure why you think dead people are films that were released, but they are not and do not belong in these articles. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  20:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC)