User talk:149.135.59.176

May 2018
Your recent editing history at A Wrinkle in Time (2018 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Twice you removed "female" from a direct quote that includes the word, incorrectly marking your edit as a typo correction.

Next you removed it incorrectly claiming we were incorrectly using a phrase as a quote.

Now you came back and removed the entire quote with a verbose explanation having nothing whatsoever to do with the quote, other than to incorrectly claim "Quoted line is not mentioned, even remotely, in the cited article."

The quoted line read "celebrating its message of female empowerment and diversity". The source says "celebrated its message of female empowerment and diversity". Yes, we should have marked the change from "celebrated" to "celebrating". However, your edits clearly are -- for whatever reason -- focused on gender.

I don't know why you have an issue with what the source quite plainly says. I don't care why you have an issue with it. If you just don't like what it says, that's a shame. If you feel you have a valid reason why the quote should not be included in the article, you will need to directly state your reason and discuss the issue on the talk page.

If you continue to remove and/or corrupt the quote without discussion, you will be blocked from editing.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 21:43, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.