User talk:149.71.108.17

February 2023
Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bellis perennis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bellis perennis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bellis perennis, you may be blocked from editing. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 14:01, 27 February 2023 (UTC)