User talk:149.86.190.235

September 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The talk (racism in the United States), you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC)


 * See MOS:RACECAPS, which says both forms are accepted. You'd think admins would make more effort to familiarise themselves with the guidelines before accusing people of vandalism, but I guess not. 149.86.190.235 (talk) 20:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Not only was the edit perfectly in line with the guidelines, but no edits at all had been made from this address in over a week. And yet you still felt it merited an immediate level 3 vandalism warning? I'll be honest, this does look a lot like insecurity on your part. I can only assume you get some sort of thrill from your own perceived sense of moral superiority? That you derive a large amount of your self-worth from the apprehension of yourself as some sort of moral guardian? 149.86.190.235 (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh wow you have personal insults--bravo. And you were honest! I didn't accuse you of vandalism; I accused you of disruptive editing, because you lowercased the B without any kind of explanation--typically that's what the racist LTAs do. And now you did it again, without an explanation in an edit summary. Yes, both forms are accepted, and I prefer the capital B. Drmies (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * "I didn't accuse you of vandalism"? What do you think "If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia" means? The convention in written English is that nationalities and religious descriptors are capitalised, but ethnic descriptors like white and black are not. You're welcome to favour a different style (as long as you do so consistently), but you simply preferring one style over another is not grounds for accusing someone of vandalism or issuing an immediate level-3 warning. How did you ever become an admin on the English Wikipedia, with such a poor grasp of the English language? Do everyone a favour and get over yourself. 149.86.190.235 (talk) 22:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Templated warning adjusted. If you really think that there is one single convention for all the written Englishes, you are only confirming that my suspicion may have been right. If you don't mind I'm going to place another warning below, a behavioral one. Drmies (talk) 22:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I'm being lenient: one level-3 warning for two sets of assholish comments. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Yikes. Looks like I hit a nerve. Having your head lodged up your own rectum is no way to go through life, son. Come out and enjoy the sunshine. 149.86.190.235 (talk) 22:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Richard Lynn seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 23:58, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Between your attacks on other editors and your POV pushing on Richard Lynn, you are skating on thin ice. I advise you to tread carefully. This should be understood as a FINAL WARNING. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Grammar School at Leeds. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. ◇  Helen   Degenerate  ◆ 19:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)