User talk:14Aedwards

January 2015
Hello, I'm Jojhutton. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to iPhone 5C because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JOJ Hutton  20:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to IPhone 6, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please don't make speculative edits with predictions of future events. —C.Fred (talk) 22:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Where are you find information about death of Jonathan Ive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.28.238.28 (talk) 11:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jonathan Ive. Thank you. —RP88 (talk) 11:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on iOS 8. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Meters (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Apple A6. Meters (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 21:55, 18 January 2015 (UTC)