User talk:14Ave

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! SatuSuro 23:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Walter Main
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia!! Just to let you know that when a person's date of death is completely unknown, it's supposed to be extrapolated from when he was last known to be living: see Manual of Style (dates and numbers). And the correct category for that is Category:Year of birth missing, for people who died relatively recently and whose date of death might well become known: if you click on that link, it explains the difference. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

unreferenced opinion
Your Wind erasure and the reasons given are correct Wikip polica, I know and I was overstepping the mark. But whar gets me here at Wikip (nothing to do with you) is this silly "We are the New Britannica" selfdelusion. If Wikip wanted to be the best or even a good encycl. it would have to throw out all the obvious nonsense here (well sourced and otherwise). I have read such nonsense here you would not believe it.. But Wikip wants to go to the market in style and leave the past behind and like every successful whore thinks without pause about how to become respectable in old age. Bingo! In comes the "You just have to be boring" and you dumb authors "better not utter a single unsourced sentence" rule, which rule is perhaps even necessary, because people here tend to write illremembered halftruths into articles about which they are basically completely ignorant about. People also tend to vandalize articles about which they know nothing about. But, as said your edit was absolutely correct.--Radh (talk) 05:42, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I assume that you are referring to my edit of the Edgar Wind article here. 14Ave (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, but as I admitted it is not souced, but you (I mean all of wikip) has to ask themselves why they want a completely boring encyclopedia--Radh (talk) 21:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, note the guidelines at WP:SEEALSO; See Alsos should be as few in number and as relevant as possible, and should not link to articles already linked in the main body of the text. Anaxial (talk) 17:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * You were clearly a well-experienced user before you started editing with the account on May 1, 2009. If you could clearly indicate the names of your prior accounts, it would go a LONG way towards convincing us that you are not Azviz.  However, given that you have no alternate explanation for your instantaeously indepth knowledge of arcane Wikipedia practice and terminology, coupled with a positive Checkuser result, there does not appear to be a more logical conclusion.  If you are not Azviz, please tell us who you are so we can put this to rest.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  01:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note the link you quote from is an essay on policy, not policy itself. Nja 247 07:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I will ask Luna Santin to comment. In the meantime, please post only one unblock request at a time.  Thanks.  Mango juice talk 03:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Luna has responded at his talk page. I would like to voice my inclination to decline this unblock request, what with this editor's unwillingness to admit practicing sock puppetry. AGK 18:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)