User talk:150.101.19.156

March 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. An edit you recently made to Gopher seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Everedux (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Jay Weinberg— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Everedux  (talk)  01:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Woolly mammoth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dictonary1 (talk) 03:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 1989 (talk) 02:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Conservation in Australia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 00:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Conservation in Australia. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Conservation in Australia was changed by 150.101.19.156 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96147 on 2020-02-17T00:41:46+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Water supply and sanitation in Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Water supply and sanitation in Australia was changed by 150.101.19.156 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886897 on 2020-02-18T03:48:18+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)