User talk:150.143.69.190

Accusations of vandalism
Please do not accuse other editors of vandalism as you did in this edit. Vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia. Additionally please do not add non-notable information. The references to the books were removed as the books do not appear to be notable, they do not have their own articles. If something is not notable it may be removed and don't accuse those that remove them of vandalism. Canterbury Tail talk 18:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Who are we to make that judgement? Our job is to report and present, surely not editorialise based on our own assumptions. That is what makes a good academic and encyclopaedia editor. 150.143.69.190 (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * And I note that in this case you have now taken away a whole swathe of undeiably major novelists, such as S. J. Parris! You don't know who they are, so you think no one else does! 150.143.69.190 (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Who are we to make that judgement? Our job is to report and present, surely not editorialise based on our own assumptions. That is what makes a good academic and encyclopaedia editor.
 * It's up to the person inserting the information to prove it's notable. If someone contests it then, per WP:BRD and WP:ONUS it is the responsibilty of the person wishing to insert the information to take it to the talk page and get consensus for inclusion and not to reinsert until such consensus is obtained. And if it's a notable novel, then it should have a Wikipedia article. Article first, then you can add info about it elsewhere. Canterbury Tail talk 22:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)