User talk:150.214.40.23

87.102.79.25 (talk) 10:58, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Gracias por tu contribucion. Te ruego que expliques tus cambios, por ejemplo, el poner Opposition to Opus Dei como cosa suelta, no me parece correcto, dado que hay otro sub-articulo que va en paralelo. Por favor, te ruego que pones en la discusion o en edit summary la razon por tus cambios para que podemos tratarlos bien. Gracias otra vez. Lafem 01:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

150, you should make an account. Edits by registered users always carry just a hair more weight. In any case, thanks for your great contributions. :)  --Alecmconroy 14:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Also-- if you want the cilice image included, you should probably upload it to Wikipedia (assuming you have the legal right to do so). Just linking to the picture in the middle of the text doesn't really fit well, styleistically, with the article. --Alecmconroy 07:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Transfer note on secret constitutions
Hi! I just transferred the footnote you added to Opus Dei in society (see footnote number 1). The addition has added one whole kb to the article. I think it is better to keep the article at 60 kb or even lower. :) And I also agree with Pradeshkava that the article has to keep right proportion based on mediation decisions. Secrecy is already dealt with in another section. Thanks! Thomas 05:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)