User talk:151.177.62.193

Utmärkt! ²skɛoːnə, alltså.

Förhoppningsvis upptäcks din ändring av en sån lingvist som hittar bland alla tecknen.

/ Johan M. Olofsson (talk) 22:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced material
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Nominative determinism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I haven't. You have not read or understood what i have written. Goes also for following section on edit warring. 151.177.62.193 (talk) 14:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history at Nominative determinism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 07:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MS Estonia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Klõps (talk) 17:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you had looked a little closer, you might have discovered that this Mr. Tammes appears out of the blue with no introduction whatsoever.
 * If you had cast a glance on my edit history, you might not have written this at all in this way. 151.177.62.193 (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * For the record: I see you have in effect vindicated my edits by providing the information I asked for. 151.177.62.193 (talk) 16:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)