User talk:151.188.137.249

January 2017
Hello, I'm Rlendog. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atlantic menhaden have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rlendog (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Korematsu v. United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Korematsu v. United States was changed by 151.188.137.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942048 on 2017-01-27T15:47:56+00:00.

March 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peanut oil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:34, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sharon Bulova— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Margarita Engle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Margarita Engle was changed by 151.188.137.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95074 on 2017-05-12T11:51:09+00:00.

September 2017
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to London Company— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. ← 13:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Politics of Monaco— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Battle of Britain— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 12:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Medieval Greece have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of the Coral Sea have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of the Coral Sea was changed by 151.188.137.249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86749 on 2021-10-27T17:15:32+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of the Coral Sea. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bloody Mary (folklore). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Doggy daycare scandal of 1734


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Doggy daycare scandal of 1734. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Helen (💬📖) 16:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doggy daycare scandal of 1734 (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doggy daycare scandal of 1734 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Doggy daycare scandal of 1734, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Doggy_daycare_scandal_of_1734 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Doggy_daycare_scandal_of_1734 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm LPS and MLP Fan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Mary Somerville have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 15:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grace Hopper. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — 3PPYB6 — T ALK — C ONTRIBS  — 15:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grace Hopper, you may be blocked from editing. Tacyarg (talk) 15:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Emmanuel Curtil have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at HMS Erin. Ormewood (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm BeywheelzLetItRip. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Hull House—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — B. L. I. R. 17:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hull House. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 17:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hull House, you may be blocked from editing. Drummingman (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hull House. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 17:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)