User talk:151.197.63.153

October 2019
Hello 151.197.63.153. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic,

false. the edits do not give any impression. i do not get paid for editing. the edit (only one) was correct and sources provided. people kept deleting it before i was even finished editing. (they tried deleting the talk page too) sources were posted on the talk page. they are factual and supported with u.s. links and isbn numbers. this edit is to correct your shill editors who delete christian business owners out of racist financial interest. YOU have the financial interest in attacking the vape inventor.. the interest is to harm him by lying about the invention. you are activly attacking him and that is not wiki policy.

As previously advised, your edits give the impression ... Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:151.197.63.153, and the template unPaid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 17:49, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

you provide no encyclopedic reason to delete the invention of tube shape vapes. only theories (that a christian might venifit) and lies about the sources (which are valid). you are therefore an obvious bigot. (with a financial interest im harming the actual inventor of tube shape vapes, an mazing piece of christian history)

you are obviously hostile to my areas of knowledge.. so having an account would be pointless. i would like to help wikipedia to filter attacks like yours. you have no right deleting facts you did not research.

the three day block was extended to aweek inapropriatly and i was prejudiciously attacked because you had an "IMPRESSION". your bias against the inventor is obvious and you did not follow wiki policy because you have only unsupported claims and lies.. the sources are factual and you are attacking the inventor out of your expressed financial motive to harm. you are way out if bounds. it even runs afowl of anti trust laws 15 usc 2 and 4.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Scott Burley (talk) 18:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You are not permitted to modify or remove a declined unblock request for your currently active block. Do not do so again. If you wish to make another unblock request, you are welcome to do so. First, read WP:GAB. Then, show that all of your edits included an appropriate citation matching WP:RS or WP:CITE. Nothing else is relevant apart from your failure to provide reliable citations for your edits. It's not relevant that you could have done, it's relevant whether or not you did (which you clearly didn't). --Yamla (talk) 19:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Vaporizer (inhalation device) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 12:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
As you immediately resumed your inappropriate editing once your prior block expired, I have blocked you again. We can keep doing this until you stop editing like this. --Yamla (talk) 13:05, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

i did not edit. please show proof.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)