User talk:151.213.193.128

July 2021
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Minnesota Freedom Fund—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I noticed that you recently removed content from Julia Fox without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 02:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Julia Fox. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 808pikachu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 808pikachu (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Julia Fox. 808pikachu (talk) 05:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

removal of trivial, well-sourced content
We noticed you're making contributions on an article about which you seem both knowledgeable and passionate. Thanks for helping! A friendly suggestion: approach your addition to the encyclopedia as though it were an important school assignment worthy of your precious time. Gather your sources, scribble a draft, let someone suggest edits, write it all down, tidy it all up, make sure it's sourced (make dam'd sure it's sourced) and the changes you're attempting will likely find a way into the article, given both factual and appropriately sourced.

Thanks again for building a truly unique encyclopedia, Saintstephen000 (talk)