User talk:151.224.44.49

You have every right to blank the page
I did attempt to self revert, as I had not intended to restore your page. In the meantime, would you discuss why you are edit warring on the Azores and Granada? Multiple editors have been reverting your changes, because they are not a reliable comparison.  Scr ★ pIron IV 19:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I am edit warring because I believe my opinion is correct. Other users can make edits, but if I deem them inappropriate, I will revert them--151.224.44.49 (talk) 19:07, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * But that is not how one achieves consensus, and Wikipedia is built on collaboration. Thus far, three experienced editors have tried to explain to you why the changes you have made are inappropriate. What will it take to convince you? An argumentative attitude and edit-warring are certain to get you blocked from editing, so what needs to happen in order to work collaboratively?  Scr ★ pIron IV 19:20, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

I don't know, but I do have Obsessive–compulsive disorder--151.224.44.49 (talk) 19:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * And you do realize that Twitter is not a reliable source? Perhaps you could direct your OCD to reading the welcome template  Scr ★ pIron IV 19:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Your recent editing history at Azores shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Scr ★ pIron IV 20:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2015
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Granada. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Favonian (talk) 21:03, 9 July 2015 (UTC)