User talk:151.238.203.47

September 2020
Hello, I'm CogitoErgoSum14. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gilaki language without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

hello sir/ma'am i refined the intro of gilaki and mazandarani language several times but each time people recovered and probably blocked me from edit, this is the reasons of my edit 1: intro claimed that the M and G language (but not other iranian langauges)share some featerus with caucasian languages, this is straight false cuz there is also cacausian tat language and talyshi language that had similar featrues 2: another claim is the ethnical connection between southcacaus people and G M people, this "serious" claim needs more diverse sources and articles and also it doesnt fit to the whole article goal(that is about linguistics);its  an ethnical/anthropological subject 3: the coordination of sentences and sources are a little bit "weird" ; for example under a linguistic title you have an ethnological interpretation with a genetic study  as a source for it, nasidze et al is not a ethnologist nor linguist and his/her "explanation" about non_genetical subjects must be used cautiously Herodotous (talk) 00:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)