User talk:151.74.215.160

Page numbers
Looking at the books themselves, of pictures of their pages, they have page numbers. The dictionary title is just a title, its not an actual dictionary, so your rules don't apply. Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * They have pages but they have alphabetical entries. YOUR rules don't apply. I am applying what Template:Page needed page says
 * They do. The template is not clear, but it appears to be for sources that are dedicated to having many items per page. Looking at samples of these books, this does not seem to be the case for these ones. It's really a matter of your word against mine, but so far we have proven they have page numbers. I'd suggest getting them. Why are you against improving the quality of these pages? Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * page needed means you can't locate the source of information. When they have alphabetically ordered entries, you just need the name of the entry to locate them, then the page is not needed. BTW Dizionario has many items per page (even a dozen) and the other generally has multiple as well.
 * I'm pretty sure the rule is for articles where page numbers are not available. I'll ask on that rules page as you want to sources to be less specific. Andrzejbanas (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should ask for a modification of what Template:Page needed page says, "this rule applies for every book except the books without page numbers". If you are right, it would be more correct. For what I understand, page is not needed when the book consists of alphabetical entries and it is sufficient to go to the letter T and then go down until you find the title. At least Template:Page needed currently suggests this.

August 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Andrzejbanas (talk) 07:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.