User talk:1515garden

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gia Paloma. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gia_Paloma&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dismas |(talk) 08:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gia Paloma. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gia Paloma was changed by 1515garden (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873674 on 2012-01-04T08:55:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gia Paloma, you may be blocked from editing. Dismas |(talk) 09:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gia Paloma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dismas |(talk) 09:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Dismas |(talk) 09:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gia Paloma shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)