User talk:152.216.11.5

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
 * The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
 * The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
 * The ability to start new pages.
 * The ability to rename pages.
 * The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
 * The ability to upload images.
 * The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
 * The eligibility to become an administrator.
 * Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by  [ creating an account] . Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. ‡  Jarlaxle   20:09, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism
You've vandalised Matt Wiese twice now. Please stop. McPhail 20:18, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Thiel College. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Xyra e  l  T 19:52, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I also have reverted a recent edit made to the article Alomari. There was no explanation of why you erased a translation tag. This is the english wikipedia so it was appropriate for me to label it as such. If you wish to discuss this go to the page listed on the tag. Thank you. Lsjzl 17:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

More vandalism
Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:Evrik on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --evrik 01:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Bahá'í division page
Hello, as much as I'm on your side regarding your edits to the Bahá'í division page, we must strive to be as neutral in the presentation of the article. The article has to just present facts, and not conclusions or interpretations. Regards. -- Jeff3000 19:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --nkayesmith 11:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Monsters of Rock page
I reverted your edit of Monsters of Rock because your comment ("This is not correct, I was there and it was Queensryche and not Pantera who performed") did not belong on the main page. You appear to have removed it and added other information while I was trying to figure out what I was doing - I apologize for the edit conflict.

Beezhive 04:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk page
Please don't edit other people's comments, it's considered vandalism. -- Jeff3000 22:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 15:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Oguz1
FYI This appears to be the IP address of User:Oguz1. --Macrakis 18:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * It's a proxy server, it's the IP of many, many, many people, and you are stalking. Get a job.


 * you just broke the Wiki privacy rule!!!

Wikimedia privacy policy On Wikimedia projects, privacy policy considerations are of tremendous importance. Unless someone is definitely violating policy with their actions (e.g. massive bot vandalism or spam), revealing their IP, whereabouts or other information sufficient to identify them is likely a violation.

Policy on release of data derived from page logs It is the policy of Wikimedia that personally identifiable data collected in the server logs will not be released by the developers who have access to it, except as follows: In response to a valid subpoena or other compulsory request from law enforcement With permission of the affected user To the chair of Wikimedia Foundation, his legal counsel, or his designee, when necessary for investigation of abuse complaints. Where the information pertains to page views generated by a spider or bot and its dissemination is necessary to illustrate or resolve technical issues. Where the user has been vandalising pages or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers Where it is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of the Wikimedia Foundation, its users or the public. Wikimedia policy does not permit public distribution of such information under any circumstances, except as described above.

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CheckUser#CheckUser_status —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oguz1 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC).


 * I broke no rules, and certainly didn't access any non-public information (like server logs). On my talk page, 152.216.11.5 wrote that he had done something which was something Oguz1 had done.  Assuming no one is lying, that means that Oguz1 uses 152.216.11.5 -- it does not mean that other people don't, too. --Macrakis 19:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Turkish coffee
Uhh...why would I block someone just because he's not adding information to the article? He's reverting edits that he feels go against consensus established at the article's talk page, or material he feels is too POV.  Nish kid 64  20:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Leonard McCoy
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

a good idea
Please sign your articles by pressing the signerature button before you save changes in a disgussion. thanks. --98.151.241.73 (talk) 04:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Bank of New York. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 17:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Narrative mode because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 15:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Flat tax, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan ²   21:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Total factor productivity, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 17:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Haley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Shrikesong (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Haley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Haley with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Petrb (talk) 13:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Haley with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Petrb (talk) 13:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Spice, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Geek Pride Day— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners 17:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm WikiLinuz. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sons of Liberty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   — Wiki Linuz  ( 💬 ) 13:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rime Center Buddhist Community
Hello, 152.216.11.5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rime Center Buddhist Community, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)