User talk:152.85.8.38

March 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: American airborne landings in Normandy was changed by 152.85.8.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97002 on 2013-03-26T20:41:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American airborne landings in Normandy with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nick—Contact/Contribs 20:45, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to New York State Police, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan ²   18:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New York State Police with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yintan ²  18:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jacksonville, Florida, you may be blocked from editing. BigPimpinBrah (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Junior Samples has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Junior Samples was changed by 152.85.8.38 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881098 on 2013-08-14T19:02:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Uptomistic concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Uptomistic, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to Patrick Willis
Hello, I'm Soham. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Uptomistic


Hello 152.85.8.38. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Uptomistic".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Heat fusion, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of fatal alligator attacks in the United States by decade, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Port Arthur, Texas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 14:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caucasian race. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 15:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016
Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Green Hill, Alabama has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016
Hello, I'm NottNott. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Florence, Alabama seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Nott Nott &#124;talk 17:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Death of a Salesman, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GS ⋙ ☎ 05:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Death of a Salesman. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GS ⋙ ☎ 05:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to North Alabama Speedway seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Butterfield Bank, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. → Emadix talk  19:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Butterfield Bank, you may be blocked from editing. Steve Quinn (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Forced circulation boiler, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)