User talk:153.111.229.202

November 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Great Lakes refugee crisis— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Great Lakes refugee crisis. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Union Pacific Big Boy, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Great Lakes refugee crisis. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC) and remember to donate to the page to support.

Suggest you get an account and please cite sources
Thanks.

BlueD954 (talk) 06:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

To second the above, please stop making unreferenced additions to the List of aircraft of the Royal Australian Air Force article. You are now adding vauge claims about topics for which reliable sources exist (multiple sources note the number of different types of aircraft operated by the RAAF - and if different sources give different numbers or confirm that numbers are actually unclear, as I suspect is likely in some cases, the article should note this with appropriate references) as well as not referencing more concrete material. I am seriously considering reverting all of your changes to the article given the sourcing problems and unnecessary vagueness. Help:Referencing for beginners provides advice you may find helpful here. Nick-D (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Healthy diet, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Royal Artillery—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 04:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Steve M. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Riccarton High School—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Steve M (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Riccarton High School. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Riccarton High School was changed by 153.111.229.202 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962654 on 2021-03-04T22:34:48+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Halswell, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of schools in Christchurch.  Schwede 66  23:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021
Hello, I'm Ken Tony. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of aircraft of the Royal Australian Navy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Ken Tony  Shall we discuss? 07:27, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Pax85. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Epistle to the Ephesians—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Pax  Verbum  03:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Fiwec81618. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of New Zealand Academy Award winners and nominees without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fiwec81618 (talk) 02:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of gendarmeries without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sumanuil. 05:50, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Antifascist Committee of Ukraine, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Alabama- (talk) 07:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jonas Vingegaard, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steroid. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Corvidae, you may be blocked from editing. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

List of air forces article
As others have already pointed out on your talk page, please stop doing test edits on main Wikipedia articles. If you wish to do article tests, please use the sandbox. Alin2808 (talk) 19:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 185 empty chairs, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 08:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Are you saying its not true!
 * Could you not find a link, 153.111.229.202 (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Callanecc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Twelve Local Heroes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Is it true - cant you look that up and add what needed? 153.111.229.202 (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Traue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Traue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jim Traue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WWGB (talk) 02:03, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Papanui High School
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Papanui High School, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20153.111.229.202&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1202113764 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Papanui_High_School&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1202113764%7CPapanui%20High%20School%5D%5D Ask for help])

Cite templates
Please use the correct cite templates when suitable (e.g "cite encyclopedia" or "cite thesis"), cheers. Alexeyevitch (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Southshore
Please stop this edit-war on the Southshore article, this seems quite confronting and I don't think you realize that it's a relatively low-socio economic suburb, other suburbs also do this. Alexeyevitch (talk) 04:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Correcting your misunderstanding is not an edit war. See the pdf link I have added to the talk page. 153.111.229.202 (talk) 05:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Please clarify or provide the link here. It's not a mistake, so please don't remove it. Southshore is a relatively low-socio economic suburb there is a reference supporting this. Alexeyevitch (talk) 05:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The information is on the talk page of the article, inappropriate to discuss here. 153.111.229.202 (talk) 05:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring
Kia ora, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia.

On Wikipedia we edit by consensus. A part of this process is the be BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. As such, rather than immediately reverting a revert, it is expected that you take the matter to the talk page of the article to discuss the issue further. Not doing so amounts to edit warring and may result in a block. Your behaviour recently on the Southshore, New Zealand article in my view crosses that line. For example, you are well-past 3RR today.

Please also familiarise yourself with the concept of tendentious editing. David Palmer// cloventt (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi David - have already addressed this on the talk page of the Southshore article, which is a more appropriate place for this discussion. You and Alexeyevitch seem to be under the mistaken impression that correcting poorly written and poorly reference articles is an "edit war". The user editing the Southshore article had repeatedly put in statements that were either unreferenced as well as statements that directly contradicted the reference they had used; and because many of these "references" are offline resources they difficult to check. I can understand one such mistake but four? (And that was a cursory check). That's extremely poor. I have corrected those for you. I believe you may have a conflict of interest due to your friendship with Alexeyevitch and are not applying the appropriate standards around impartiality and neutrality. Remember on Wikipedia: Anonymous editing is embraced and welcomed. 153.111.229.202 (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Your talk page is the appropriate place to discuss your editing behaviour.
 * Your reply indicates you did not read the page I linked. Please read those articles regarding appropriate editing behaviour on Wikipedia. Your activity was disruptive enough that it resulted in the page being marked as semi-protected by an admin.
 * You are welcome to edit anonymously, and actually I'm not sure why you have brought that up because I didn't mention it. However, even when editing anonymously, you must still follow the guidelines for how we edit on Wikipedia. David Palmer// cloventt (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * David, you need to take a step back, and note that any 'tendentious editing' has been coming from Alexeyevitch and Roger 8 Roger. The edits I made were all referenced to neutral and impartial resources. What I removed were some judgemental statements which were not referenced, and a statement which said the opposite to the item referenced. Sometimes editors need to take a breath, and look at their own work. I can understand Alexeyevitch is emotionally attached to the work in the article, but that doesn't mean it is correct. Note also rather than addressing the content issues (which I have corrected for you) both you and Alexeyevitch have tried to make it personal.
 * Both of you need to reflect on this: "Problems arise when editors see their own bias as neutral, and especially when they assume that any resistance to their edits is founded in bias towards an opposing point of view." 153.111.229.202 (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Once again, please read the linked pages, specifically on the BRD cycle. There is an established process for content disputes, which you have not followed.
 * I'll also add civility, assume good faith and consensus to that reading list. Your contributions are valuable, but the way you have gone about making them has caused more friction than it needed to. David Palmer// cloventt (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Address your bias. All work on the page was documented both in editing and in the talk page.
 * Don't over-guard articles: Even if a subject is close to an editor's heart, or an article has been fostered lovingly, remember that no one owns an article and articles are built by communal shared collaboration.
 * Again, your focus should be on the content not on the personal attachment. Some reading for you: Wikilawyering 153.111.229.202 (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The keyword there is collaboration. Reaching consensus on talk pages for disputed content is a critical part of that process that you would benefit from. Please carefully read those linked articles and introspect a little.
 * I dispute your claims of "bias", wiki-lawyering and over-guarding and won't engage with you further on that.
 * Best wishes for your future editing on Wikipedia and I hope you stick around. I think I've done my best to educate you on how to make your experience a little less abrasive, the rest is up to you. David Palmer// cloventt (talk) 01:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, why have I been sent this warning? I have not edited this document at all. Please address your problems with each other to the correct people please. - James 153.111.229.202 (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi James, you may be viewing Wikipedia from a shared IP address. Are you perhaps at a public library? When editing anonymously on Wikipedia, your IP address is used to identify your edits. As a result, you are sharing this talk page with other users editing from the same place. If you haven't done any editing you can safely ignore this warning.
 * If you would like to have your own talk page, you should consider [ creating an account] . It's totally free of charge and comes with benefits. David Palmer// cloventt (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Homo Sapiens (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wiiformii (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)