User talk:153.165.135.190

Hot Sugar
Hi there, you seem to be misunderstanding the purpose of WP:BLP. A neutrally-written and thoroughly referenced section is valid for inclusion. Why do you think it should be removed? NekoKatsun (nyaa)
 * Hot Sugar, the subject of the article, called these allegations "false and disparaging." He also stated that they "are co-conspirators who have engaged in libel and slander, among other unlawful acts, against [Hot Sugar] over the course of years including recently through various social media publications such as Twitter and Wikipedia." 153.165.135.190 (talk) 23:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Then what you would want to do is find a source for that statement and include that in the article, not simply remove the claims. You also just broke 3RR; I'll be moving the allegations to the talkpage and expect to see them returned to the article by you once you've found a source for the rebuttal. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 23:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If someone restore the content to the article, Hot Sugar may file a defamation lawsuit against him/her again. In the previous lawsuit filed in 2018, Hot Sugar "initially sought at least $100,000 in damages." I don't wanna get sued for restoring the content. 153.165.135.190 (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Gaelan 💬✏️ 23:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)