User talk:154.117.166.206

January 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ron h jones (Talk) 23:34, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

About the block
2) That this is a level 2 warning seems to indicate you saw one of the warnings above from User:154.119.79.254 but either did not see or did not read the responses to that block user's nonsense. See: SummerPhDv2.0

You call it nonsense SummerPhD? I read the responses. Look at your reverts to my Special:Contributions/154.117.166.206, you reverted 4 Wikipedia articles that others have been marked as disruptive editing, what you did there was proof of an example of going under the rule ownership of content and disruptive editing on your part. I can prove my edits are not nonsense. This edit from Gangs in Australia has two references to "Greeks" and "Black Disciples", also why are the Forty Thieves up there when there is an article of Forty Thieves from New York city? where they not around the same time frame as the "Bowe Brothers"?. Gangs in the United States in This edit was as to that gangs where prominent in the areas stated, most of all being the Bronx. For more information I will provide sources. Not only that but question is where's your sources for reverting my edits or why aren't you speaking? You aren't contributing correctly to Wikipedia?, Why place the "Edit warring" in talk pages when you don't only put it on the users talk page besides an article talk page?, I don't see this on any other talk page. What your doing is incompetent. I'd like to see your word on this too ''' Acroterion. ''' 154.117.166.206 (talk) 14:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Your nominal block, apart from the proxy block was extended to one week after this and you're evading that block. I endorse the one-week block on this IP since you've continued the personal attacks here, and would have made it two weeks if I'd set the block. Don't evade blocks and don't make personal attacks.   Acroterion   (talk)   18:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Got it but it was the other IP where there where threats threats not this one. I don't see any threats here besides the one here. I was saying that the reverts to This edit by SummerPhD for example 154.117.166.206 (talk) 23:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Personal attacks aimed at SummerPhD continue here - not "threats". "What your doing is incompetent" linked to Wiktionary, no less. That's not acceptable.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)