User talk:154.121.35.108

biased content
your article about zand dynasty complementing the founder karim zand as humanitarian is contradictory with his conduct against sunnites in Iraq he was as cruel as the safavid before him and when he got in basrah he slaughtered the people there for 3 days, but because the british complemented him so every thing is forgiven and silenced, i am wondering why everything historical topic about the middle east in wikipedia must be told from orientalistic perspective and the british one precisely? knowing that they are already biased sources that tend to deminish the authentic islamic sources and present the opinions of their authors as facts