User talk:155.220.248.90

August 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Photography and the law. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chocolate Rain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Hello, I'm Glane23. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Barry Winchell— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 14:18, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 401st Air Support Group (December 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheMagnificentist was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:401st Air Support Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- TheMagnificentist (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Super48paul (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

You defeat the Wikipedia mission. Why let anyone edit if all you wiki police do is remove everything. Wikipedia is now a small 1% minority exercising power over the other 99% without authority. This is the last time I will ever use Wikipedia, so your mission is accomplished.

July 2017
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mechanism of action of aspirin— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:13, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Disneyland Railroad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toreightyone (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You defeat the Wikipedia mission. Why let anyone edit if all you wiki police do is remove everything. Wikipedia is now a small 1% minority exercising power over the other 99% without authority. This is the last time I will ever use Wikipedia, so your mission is accomplished.

July 2018
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Spades, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.