User talk:156.3.55.122

January 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to lettuce, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the First Transcontinental Railroad article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JAaron95 &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs   16:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was changed by 156.3.55.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947638 on 2016-03-04T21:36:29+00:00.

May 2016
Hello, I'm Mike1901. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Minotaur with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mike1901 (talk) 20:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lincoln–Douglas debates has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lincoln–Douglas debates was changed by 156.3.55.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952774 on 2017-05-03T19:08:48+00:00.

May 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kangaroo Island emu have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kangaroo Island emu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kangaroo Island emu, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Howard Ferguson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Howard Ferguson, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Howard Ferguson was changed by 156.3.55.122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907385 on 2018-11-09T17:53:59+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:54, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Agent00x. I noticed that in this edit to University of Notre Dame, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Agent00x (talk) 21:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

WikiRay360 (talk) 05:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

October 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Titanotylopus, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Mr Fink (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of Hispanic and Latino Americans have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 17:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to James Borrego have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2022 (UTC)