User talk:156.57.178.91

February 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Operation Desert Hawk, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chengdu J-10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 03:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Operation Desert Hawk, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kiwiz1338. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to WION—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 02:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Oblivy (talk) 13:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sukhoi Su-30. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Oblivy (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sukhoi_Su-30. ''Frequent reversion of good-faith edits by other users, despite warnings. This IP has engaged in similar behavior on Media of India.'' Oblivy (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sharada Peeth—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)