User talk:156.62.3.187

September 2017
Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rakuten— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. → Message me. 🖉← 23:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018
Hello, I'm Gab4gab. An edit that you recently made to Auckland University of Technology seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gab4gab (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Patel. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Auckland University of Technology, you may be blocked from editing. - gadfium 05:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to Function-spacer-lipid Kode construct. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Donner60 (talk) 02:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)


 * I am striking the above message because I think your edit was probably in good faith and, at least, a last warning appears not to be warranted. You placement of a bare URL in the text is not appropriate. Your link is explanatory though it could be interpreted as advertising so it is questionable. I would not object to it being place in an external links section in proper format but I can only speak for myself. See External links for allowed links and formatting or a further link to the style for formatting if not fully explained.


 * Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Eugenics— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Warkworth, New Zealand— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 02:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Barbara Bollard


A tag has been placed on Draft:Barbara Bollard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://dev.aut.ac.nz/profiles/barbara-bollard-breen. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Okra. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.