User talk:156.99.193.145

September 2013
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan de Oñate with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Flyer22 (talk) 23:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Attaboy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Staphylococcus aureus because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Attaboy (talk) 16:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edits to Friday the 13th
Hello, I'm My name is not dave. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Friday the 13th, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 15:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Friday the 13th
Hello, I'm My name is not dave. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Friday the 13th, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 15:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Friday the 13th. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Friday the 13th was changed by 156.99.193.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959453 on 2013-10-22T15:53:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Friday the 13th. O.Koslowski (talk) 15:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to William McKinley has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: William McKinley was changed by 156.99.193.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939503 on 2013-11-13T17:38:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William McKinley with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Turgan Talk 17:40, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William McKinley with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 17:41, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to William McKinley. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 17:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mr.Z-man 17:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to United States v. Nixon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: United States v. Nixon was changed by 156.99.193.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869478 on 2013-12-17T20:32:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:32, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your contributions are welcome, but your recent edit to the page Anaconda Plan appears to have been unconstructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe your edit was constructive, please make sure you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thanks. Delaywaves &bull;&#32; talk  00:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Poaching has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Poaching was changed by 156.99.193.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864613 on 2014-01-08T16:39:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dwpaul. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Poaching, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ''Please note that personal commentary about specific incidents of poaching, or unsourced statements about the phenomenon in general, are misplaced in an encyclopedic article on the topic. Please do not continue to insert information concerning this specific poacher and her history.''  Dwpaul  Talk   19:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Otto von Bismarck
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC)