User talk:157.107.41.153

June 2019
Hello, I'm Abequinn14. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fu Xinqi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Abequinn14 (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Fight Between the Snipe and the Clam. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 11:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Two Bombs, One Satellite, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 12:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Super heavy-lift launch vehicle. You commented "Making Accurate" when adding inaccurate information. Please get a WP:CLUE. — JFG talk 01:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. El_C 08:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)