User talk:157.34.62.25

Help me!
Please help me with... 157.34.62.25 (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The very fact that you need to ask the question indicates that you have reasons to wonder if Wikipedia is honest or reliable. Nothing we say here will reassure you much. Our standard position is that Wikipedia is not itself a reliable source. In part, that's because "anyone can edit" and in part it is because Wikipedia relies on publications that we generally consider to be reliable but those publications have sometimes proved to be inaccurate, incorrect, or corrupted. When things are working as intended, any statement you find on Wikipedia can be traced to an external source. It is up to you to decide whether that external source should be trusted. In a few cases – Daily Mail and Times of India – a source has been deprecated, at least for some purposes, by a consensus of the community. But even highly respected sources like The New York Times have been found to have stories that are fabricated or planted. It's a jungle out there; every source must be considered as potentially tainted and we may never know for sure.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks@ Jmcgnh. When I asked about Wikipedia [Subject].You talked about Wikipedia [Object]. For Me what subjective you are, comes first. What object you are is not my concern to think if I don't know the first. There is a diffrent between both and remember Subject drives,Objects is driven. You know who has the control over whom! I believe Subject is the answer if I had to choose one between two in case of any active help. I [ Subject] control what characteristic [ Object] I will own. [ Show me your character, your characteristics are not new to me]. I am new to technology, not to technologist. Power without balance is useless and knowledge without paitence is useless. I have none but my character. Good or worst, I stay open. Usefull or useless I stay open. This openness is hard earned. I had lost many words unspoken. I had spoken many words unfound. Thank you for responding. My attempts will not stop. If Wikipedia is not reliable then I have another reliable, The guide [ Subject] who shows and walk along on the way [ Object]. I don't care what destination is being decided or what improvements in way are done or what new ways or turnings are ahead. My priority is now [ whatever it is ] to be in. If clean or dirty I have water in worst thirst of mine, I will drink it, if you say you don't have processed mineral water [ Reliable/A2Zble] to give me now.[ Know the need ] 49.35.192.134 (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)