User talk:157.99.249.59

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Plumbagin, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Curcumin. Zefr (talk) 15:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Medicine edits from 157.99.249.59 (hexane.chimorg.pasteur.fr, Institut Pasteur) reported at WP:AIV. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, you're finally talking at AN/I. Good. Now, slow down and learn Wikipedia's rules and take time to read the articles you're editing. While you were busy on your quest to right WP:GREATWRONGS, you missed that Curcumin already mentions this issue in the lead and body, using specific citations (to avoid what we call improper synthesis), and even links to our article on Pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS). Compare that wording to your own template wording and you'll see it is specific, better sourced, and neutrally worded (versus the emotive wording you used). You're not being reverted by fans of pseudoscience or "quacks", but by editors who understand how we need to write encyclopedia entries. Continue in this vein and I or another admin will block you. Fences  &amp;  Windows  10:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)