User talk:158.143.170.64

Please stop removing the speedy deletion notice from the article Mukunda Goswami. It very clearly says within the notice itself "do not remove this notice from articles that you have created yourself." If you feel that this article does not qualify for deletion under Wikipedia's criteria, then specify why on the talk page, but leave the deletion notice where it is. An admin should always check the talk page before deleting an article, so your comments will be heard there. Thanks. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 00:50, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Urmila Devi Dasi
I have nominated Urmila Devi Dasi, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Urmila Devi Dasi. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MBest-son (talk) 22:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Steven J. Rosen
I have nominated Steven J. Rosen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Steven J. Rosen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Defender of torch (talk) 10:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Urmila Devi Dasi
I have nominated Urmila Devi Dasi, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Urmila Devi Dasi&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gaura79 (talk) 10:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of International Society for Krishna Consciousness members and patrons
I have nominated List of International Society for Krishna Consciousness members and patrons, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of International Society for Krishna Consciousness members and patrons. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wikid as&#169; 09:24, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Urmila Devi Dasi for deletion
The article Urmila Devi Dasi is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Urmila Devi Dasi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaura79 (talk) 08:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steven J. Rosen


The article Steven J. Rosen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * BLP with very, very bad sourcing. Everything is self-published, aside from one short mention tangentially in another source. I can't establish notability, but it's hard to sort through all of the "Steven Rosen"s; look at the article and the tags, and try to verify just one thing - you get the point.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. St John Chrysostom ΔόξατωΘεώ 09:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Urmila Devi Dasi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urmila Devi Dasi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Urmila Devi Dasi& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Venkat TL (talk) 13:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)