User talk:158.181.81.216

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Two-Ocean Navy Act, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Hi there, your edit was reverted because criticisms about the article itself should be placed on the article's talk page. Have a nice day and happy editing :)'' Arxion (talk) 17:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * that is not criticism, that is a caveat for the reader.
 * how did you come here so quickly? have i matched a filter of yours? 158.181.81.216 (talk) 17:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I’d like to apologise for my misjudgment. When I was looking at your edit (specifically the difference (shortened to “diff” in the Wikipedia interface)), I mistakenly thought it was a comment in the article about facts in the article itself (I see this happen often). I will make sure I am more careful of this when reviewing edits in the future.

As for how I found your edit, it was flagged in the recent changes log as ”may be bad faith” (as far as I remember). This filter is not always accurate, as yours was good-faith of course.

Have a great day and happy editing :)

Arxion (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. Your recent edit to Epicyclic gearing appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)


 * you don't need a source to tell you that 3 external gears in series go:
 * clockwise, counterclockwise, clockwise
 * and thus the 4th internal gear will go clockwise, same as the sun gear.
 * https://youtu.beNOFILTER/iFlZzZnHHaI?t=193 158.181.81.216 (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * there is also the equation in the very same section
 * w(s) = w(r) * (R - 1)
 * same sign. same direction. 158.181.81.216 (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2022 (UTC)


 * If you hold the ring carrier stationary and rotate, say the sun gear, this causes the planet gear(s) to rotate. The planet gear rotates counter to the sun gear and the outside of the planet gear is rotating in the opposite direction. The ring gear follows this and is therefore rotation in the opposite direction of the sun gear. In this case, the planet gear(s) are rotating in the same direction. See gif: File:Epicyclic Gearing Stationary Carrier.gif Adakiko (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)


 * "Some epicyclic gear trains employ two planetary gears which mesh with each other. One of these planets meshes with the sun gear, the other planet meshes with the ring gear."
 * the image does not show planet gears meshing with one another. 158.181.81.216 (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2022 (UTC)