User talk:159.18.26.96

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider  [ creating an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (159.18.26.96) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome!  ミーラー強斗武   (StG88ぬ会話) 04:02, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Victor Wooten— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 20:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Fourth Crusade
Hello. Your compromise "result" wording looks fine to me. Point taken about original and wider objectives not being achieved. Buistr (talk) 18:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Death of Sammy Yatim
Thank you for your edits. I have removed the information you added about the jury verdict because you did not have a reliable source. It's impossible to know the reason the jury found Forcillo not guilty on the murder charge - it could be that they found he was justified in shooting. But it's possible the Crown didn't make out all the elements of the offence as well (not likely, but possible). I'd suggest you wait until there's a reliable source out on the reasons before adding something like that. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy to wait for more sources if you'd like, but the conclusion I added is being reported quite widely across all media outlets. Please take a look here, for example, where it's explicitly stated: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/james-forcillo-verdict-1.3414974 I just feel it would be helpful to indicate what each charge means in reference to the specific actions that were being debated at the trial. The casual reader will not know what (specifically) he is guilty of doing or not doing if all we say is "attempted murder". 159.18.26.96 (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Fair point, I think you could add it with that citation. I don't really understand how the CBC can say that conclusively - all the jury says is guilty or not guilty, and there are other elements to the crime. I'll try to add something now with the citation though. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:37, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Paul Tierney (referee), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)