User talk:159.205.25.200

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Finally, please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries. Please communicate with civility. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * What was abusive or inappropriate in my edit summaries ? I didn't changed content back as it should be - I mean without repeated reference. I've added additional reference  - imho not needed - just to avoid edit war  because  other editor dont want read the content the referce was pointing out or just dont understand plain english. I think repeated reference should be removed but deleting whole section of description is just pure vandalism instead. If you think temporary page protection would help here just do that. 159.205.25.200 (talk) 08:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)