User talk:159.83.115.2

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (159.83.115.2) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and  [ create an account] . If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Joint Commission, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TJH2018 talk  18:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To the editor of joint commission page.

Hi.

I am wondering about your recent deletes of my joint commission criticisms. I cited peer reviewed articles. It is unclear why you decide this was not a good enough source. Please explain further.

Lucas, Charles E., Angie L. Vlahos, and Anna M. Ledgerwood. "Kindness kills: the negative impact of pain as the fifth vital sign." Journal of the American College of Surgeons 205.1 (2007): 101-107.

Journal of American College of Surgeons not verifiable? You are kidding right? Try this link.

http://www.journalacs.org

Here is a link to the article I referenced. http://www.journalacs.org/article/S1072-7515(07)00152-4/abstract

How about this reference?

The efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings?." Anesthesia & Analgesia 101.2 (2005): 474-480

I use this reputable journal every day in my practice, as do 100% of anesthesiologists practicing today. To claim it isn't a verifiable source is very strange.

Here is a direct link to the article I reference. http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Abstract/2005/08000/The_Efficacy_and_Safety_of_Pain_Management_Before.32.aspx

Please respond with a very detailed explanation why you feel these sources are not verifiable.

Thanks.

I'm not sure how to do this talk - page stuff. I hope this message gets to you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: YoungWhite (April 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheDragonFire was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:YoungWhite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheDragonFire (talk) 16:16, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to ProSieben—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)