User talk:160.2.37.128

June 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Brett Cooper (commentator), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I disagree with your opinion of the 'appearance', and the revision. I do not see anything in the policies linked that invalidates this edit.  It seems to be subjective disagreement with the edit personally, although pointing to a policy or guideline specifically for reference might change that.
 * https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/media-matters/
 * Far to Extreme is most definitely the correct moniker, although I avoided editing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Matters_for_America ,even though it's not semi-protected, as I don't believe that particular page should be edited by a non-registered editor
 * Familiarize yourself specifically with the "Funded By/Ownership and "Analysis/Bias" section.
 * Mediabiasfactcheck.com is a reliable source used all over Wikipedia on a variety of entries and pages 160.2.37.128 (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * According to the entry for Media Bias/Fact Check in the list of sources that are frequently discussed on Wikipedia, There is consensus that Media Bias/Fact Check is generally unreliable, as it is self-published. Editors have questioned the methodology of the site's ratings. Please feel free to discuss this further on the Brett Cooper article Talk page. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)