User talk:1607BA1776USA

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

 * Wikipedia is not censored. If material is reliably sourced, it is given due weight.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.

March 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

''

Because National Policy Institute is under Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, it is under WP:1RR, meaning that you may not revert more than once in a 24 hour period.

This particular issue has also already been discussed multiple times, in tedious detail, on the article's talk page, and consensus is against using euphemisms or public relations language, since Wikipedia isn't a platform for advertising.'' Grayfell (talk) 07:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)