User talk:161.150.176.2

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jif (peanut butter) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jif (peanut butter) was changed by 161.150.176.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890636 on 2014-11-04T14:55:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 17:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Valencia, Pennsylvania, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Slanderous remarks are illegal and not tolerated on Wikipedia
Just wanted to let you know that I removed your slanderous change of words concerning Craig J. N. de Paulo, stating that he was "removed" instead of "separated from" the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Your contempt of the subject he clear from your edit remarks stating that he the article was created by the subject and his "extreme negative background" was missing. Hey, get a life! Remember that your IP addresses are recorded by the world wide web and by wikipedia, which can be traced by the police. Slander is a crime. 2601:45:8001:A70F:686E:EA08:FE07:9A58 (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Hmm...actually User 161.150.176.2, you needn't be concerned at the above comment as IP lookups work both ways, and I know who this idiot is. Besides, it it's never slander when the pure truth is made known. Craig de Paulo on public record as a thief, liar, fraud, and a catholic priest with a criminal record for publicly masturbating, harassment and stalking. I'd watch the newspapers for more enlightening facts coming soon. Now two people know his true history, it soon may be an entire metropolitan area once his background goes to print.

Make peace with something
I completely understand your posts about dePaulo. What you don't seem to get is that you and everyone else he has affected are dealing with a bonafide narcissist. That type of personality disorder can never feel true remorse, and you'll never get any repentance from him. He wreaked havoc in Pittsburgh, Boston, Philadelphia, New York, and Italy, in the Catholic, Episcopal and Protestant churches and will continue to do so everywhere he goes because he's unbalanced. You have some pieces of the real story but I advise you to do as I did and get the full facts of his background from the archeparchy in Philadelphia for Ukrainian Catholics. However this dePaulo is only a consequence of the bigger unspoken problem. The bishop who ordained him is the true villain because he was the one freely soliciting grossly unqualified men into his diocese, which is why Moskal was forcibly removed from duty and not merely retired. Be assured dePaulo was not the first sex offender that bishop sheltered within his diocese. Moskal's replacement, Bura, was never enthroned in that diocese because he didn't do much of anything to control these rogue priests like dePaulo. The archeparchy retains higher hopes for the new, younger bishop.

You cannot "get back" at dePaulo because that type is attracted to money and power like a moth to a flame; they will lie, cheat, steal, harass, and charm their way to get what they want, but you can bring attention to the existing problem with other priests in that diocese and make a justified stink about it. Do your research and collect the facts. Write the new bishop, then contact the press if he will not do anything about a bad cleric. When I was in contact with the archeparchy about dePaulo, they had a wealth of information to offer but their clergy didn't collect the true facts-rather it was people from dePaulo's diocese that had done the homework for the archeparchy. It was great to see members of a church getting together to stand up for themselves- something you Catholics don't do often enough. Find those people and talk with them if you want the full story. Their complaints got the Vatican to issue a policy change for ordinations in all eastern Catholic rites and their respective bishops, and dePaulo is excommunicated. That didn't prevent him from inventing his own little church and inflated title of course, but he'll never be installed as a legitimate cleric in any Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican, Episcopal or Lutheran churches where he can prey on a large number of believers and their pocketbooks. I pray for peace in your heart, but also for fortitude and security as well.

January 2016
Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moors have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  20:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Boomhauer has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 19:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dearborn, Michigan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 20:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.