User talk:161.38.221.129

March 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sinkhole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Altaïr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to At Any Price (film), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Altaïr Ibn-La'Ahad 20:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Scientific racism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Scientific racism was changed by 161.38.221.129 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868031 on 2014-09-09T18:20:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Valerie Solanas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:54, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Stamos, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Just the water, not the baby
Hi, your recent edit to Argosy University was just too broad. Although removing WP:UNDUE & WP:FAILEDVERIFICATION, you also removed valid citations that referred to an earlier portion of the paragraph. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. I have reverted your edit but removed the biased material while retaining the citations. Please be more exact in the future. Peaceray (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)