User talk:162.129.251.85

Hello, I'm David Eppstein. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Greedy algorithm because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susana Lima (March 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susana Lima and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Susana_Lima Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hermera34&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Susana_Lima reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 14:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

November 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Black Friday (shopping), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   04:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Council Rock High School North, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Holy Trinity Diocesan High School. David Brooks (talk) 02:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pittsburgh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Randal Burns has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Randal Burns. Thanks!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


 * , I have a professional COI with the subject of the article but I am not the person in the article. Please let me know if anything else is required. Thanks.162.129.251.85 (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Thank you. I notice you have declared your COI in the draft talk page. However, you declared your COI in your user talk page (this is your "user talk" page) instead of your User page - see link -this is your "user" page). Kindly rework. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I do understand the distinction between a User page and the user talk page but am unable to create the user page for this IP. Can you please do that and add the COI template there? Thanks. 162.129.251.85 (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I forgot you cant have a user page if you are not registered. Although registered is not neccessary, but I would highly recommand you to do so for there are certain features only registered user could help and as well as certian user right which a registered user could apply. See Why create an account?. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randal Burns has been accepted
 Randal Burns, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 04:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Randal_Burns help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Swapan K. Gayen, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Users claiming to be a relative of the subject of an article cannot be verified and therefore are not a reliable source.


 * Verifiability. "Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form". Unpublished materials are not considered reliable."


 * Verifiability. "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)