User talk:162.17.54.193

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mask (computing) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mask (computing) was changed by 162.17.54.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870064 on 2014-03-04T19:53:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:53, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mask (computing), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  –  T C  Memoire  19:54, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Civilian Conservation Corps with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  15:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Civilian Conservation Corps. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Civilian Conservation Corps was changed by 162.17.54.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980805 on 2014-11-04T15:29:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Viola Liuzzo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Viola Liuzzo was changed by 162.17.54.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883951 on 2014-12-15T20:44:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Viola Liuzzo with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  20:45, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm PhilKnight. An edit you recently made to Beryllium seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beryllium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Beryllium was changed by 162.17.54.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883584 on 2015-02-10T16:15:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Battle of Chancellorsville— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   14:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Fort Sumter with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   14:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Fort Sumter with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   14:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Fort Sumter. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Battle of Fort Sumter was changed by 162.17.54.193 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986796 on 2015-10-06T14:21:48+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chattanooga, Tennessee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 14:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nuremberg trials— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Occupy Wall Street have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 17:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beanie Babies. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pigwig (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.