User talk:162.197.6.47

June 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at San Diego Reader. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Kire1975 (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * In what way did I not exercise good faith? It's just the opposite. 162.197.6.47 (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Assume, not exercise. Read more at WP:AGF. Kire1975 (talk) 04:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sometimes it seems that people on Wikipedia only want "good faith" to work in one direction, but not both. You are assuming that the victims in this case were white supremacists when there is no evidence of that. When are you going to start exercising "good faith?  I have some circumstantial reasons to believe that the convicted Antifa and/or their political allies would deface this page and dox the reporter, whose articles they don't like. 162.197.6.47 (talk) 13:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Defamation is not just a violation of Wikipedia rules but a violation of the law. You should have some real proof that these persons are white supremacists before you characterize them as that. 162.197.6.47 (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not a regular editor on Wikipedia. The ringleader in San Diego of the Antifa group that was convicted in this case is known for his dirty tricks and threats issued to people who oppose his politics, not to mention he has been convicted of conspiracy to commit violent attacks on innocent people.  The reporter in this case told me personally that Jesse Cannon has shown up at her door. I assume it was to intimidate her via the threat of physical violence.  He has been convicted twice of felony violent attacks.   He is now in prison serving a five-year sentence for violent crimes.  Doxing her on Wikipedia is not very considerate, to say the least.  Her safety is put at risk by your post, because he still has violent associates who are free.  There is no reason to expose her name like that except in retaliation for her reporting. And what you imply is false, she still has media credentials and has continued to cover this prosecution and trial, including taking photos of the trial. See reference below to a recent article of hers.  The police may have pulled her credentials in error, but they gave them back.  Do you not care at all about truth in your edits? The trial is over now except for a couple of the 12 Antifa Defendants still have not yet been sentenced. 162.197.6.47 (talk) 15:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kire1975 (talk) 09:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – bradv  02:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.