User talk:162.208.95.194

May 2015
Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Bill Green (hammer thrower), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 00:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bill Green (hammer thrower) has been reverted. Your edit here to Bill Green (hammer thrower) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyZnIyg6J_g) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2015 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Talkback
Neil N  talk to me 20:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Bill Green Hammer Thrower (NielN Bias Towards This Page)
I am engaged in a debate with Wikipedia monitor "NielN", who has removed entries about the subject's family members who have noteworthy background which he considers "name dropping", "not relevant", "trivia", "flowery" descriptions. He has stated that editors who have conflict of interest have sought to list "as many accomplishments as possible, even if they are not [the subject's) Green's"

"NielN" has removed references to the following, all of which are validated by a public information article substantiating accuracy:

-College education of the subject's father, grandfather as professor, at Stanford University -Mention of subject's son making the semi-final of Jr National Team selection in another sport -That a film the subject worked on was directed and produced by Danny DeVito on a book written by Roald Dahl

"NielN" clearly demonstrates bias towards this editing under the guise of conflict of interest, as these things are obviously relevant to the life story of the subject. Will some objective Wikipedia monitor please intervene?
 * No one is going to see this. Use the article's talk page like I suggested for greater visibility. --Neil N  talk to me 22:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

WP:30
Thank you for listing your dispute at Third opinion. Your request did not follow the guidelines for listing disputes. These guidelines are in place because they make sure that the editor who writes the Third Opinion is not biased, and that (s)he can easily see what the dispute is about.

The description of the dispute should be concise and neutral, and you should sign with the timestamp only. A concise and neutral description means that only the subject matter of the dispute should be described, and not your (nor anyone else's) views on it. For example, in a dispute about reliable sources, do not write "He thinks this source is unreliable", but rather write "Dispute about the reliability of a source". To sign with only the timestamp, and without your username, use five tildes instead of four.

Your request for a Third Opinion may have been edited by another editor to follow the guidelines - feel free to edit it again if necessary. If the dispute is of such a nature that it cannot follow the guidelines, another part of the dispute resolution process may be able to help you. For example, Wikiquette alerts is a good place to alert others to a particular editor's behaviour. Thank you for opting to use the dispute resolution process. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:09, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amunet has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amunet was changed by 162.208.95.194 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859891 on 2016-10-23T10:38:29+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 10:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arcturian, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 10:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vishnu. Serols (talk) 10:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)