User talk:162.211.150.219

Continued use of Wikipedia for promotion
If you continue to misuse Wikipedia to promote BJ Klock, you will be blocked from editing. This includes edits made via this IP, your IPv6 range, or any registered accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for narrow self-interested or promotional activity in article writing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * As you restored the disputed entry again, I have blocked you as I clearly noted I would do if your promotional editing continued.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * given this IP's recent history I'd say this is almost certainly User:Johnnyhopkins09878 trying to avoid their block. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BJ Klock


A tag has been placed on Draft:BJ Klock, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Draft:BJ Klock, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.   ◊ PRAHLAD balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Draft:BJ Klock. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)