User talk:162.221.223.27

August 2023
Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bloody Monday have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sjö (talk) 09:59, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Confederate States Congress. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IncompA 13:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Cowpens, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * There was no disruption. The talk page itself conclusively came down on the battle being a "decisive" figure and several academic sources state the claim. Get over yourself. You are the one vandalizing and if you continue, I will report you and have you banned. 162.221.223.27 (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Talk:Southern West Virginia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Southern West Virginia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Battle of New Orleans have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 19:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm StefenTower. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to History of Kentucky have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. ''Further, in my nearly 20 years as a Wikipedian, I don't think I've ever seen such an ignorant, ahistorical addition to an article as yours in this case. You really should be ashamed of yourself.'' Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 23:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hello, I'm StefenTower. I noticed that you recently removed content from Culture of the Southern United States without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Major changes, including mass content removal, without any explanation is disruptive and doesn't help with article development. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 07:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)