User talk:162.222.25.236

December 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Austin S. Miller have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Austin S. Miller was changed by 162.222.25.236 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940907 on 2021-12-08T04:28:56+00:00

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Austin S. Miller. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Kaseng55 (talk) 04:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Austin S. Miller. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kaseng55 (talk) 04:37, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austin S. Miller. ''Call the FBI if you were scammed. Do not deface an encyclopedia page about a person who had nothing to do with it, besides his name being used. If I call you on the phone and claim to be the Queen of England, are you gonna deface articles about her too? If we allowed that, there's be a warning on every notable person's page - and since notability is required for a biography page to exist, that'd be every single biography page we have.'' T`swift`rocks (talk) 04:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Kaseng55 (talk) 04:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.